Start With the Sentence That Cannot Be Kept
When a policy notice names a credit card page, editors often search the URL for banned words. Work clause by clause and find the sentence making a promise the publisher cannot keep. The enforcement table puts “concrete promises that cannot be fulfilled” in the egregious column, naming “promising loans” and “specific promises outside of your control,” including “no credit check.” One egregious violation equals one strike; five normal violations equal one strike.
Rewrite direction: remove the promise, not soften it. “Guaranteed approval” becomes a statement of what the page contains, not what the reader will receive. Adding “usually” to “no credit check” leaves the outcome outside the publisher’s control. Replace offer-like headlines with neutral navigation, and attribute provider terms to their source.
Why Credit Card Pages Face Two Different Rule Sets
Page copy and ad targeting fall under different publisher rules, so conflating them yields incomplete fixes. In the US and Canada, personalization restrictions bar targeting by gender, age, parental status, marital status or ZIP code for several categories. Named categories include credit-related products and services, banking products and services, and certain financial planning and management services; credit cards and loans are examples. This restricts delivery, not writing.
Separately, negative financial-status information—signals of a lower credit rating or higher debt burden—is sensitive. The retrieved privacy text says it may not select or target personalized ads or be used in audience data such as cookie lists. Rewriting a sentence will not cure a segment built around “bad credit” or “high debt.” Copy, targeting and data collection need separate passes.
Clause-Level Rewrites: Approval, Free Money, and Uncontrollable Outcomes
The table maps recurring claim families to policy language and stated consequences. If a sentence matches a risky element, remove the promise rather than adding a disclaimer that leaves it intact.
| Policy area | Risky page element | Retrieved policy text | Stated consequence |
|---|
| Misrepresentation — promises | Guaranteed approval, “no credit check,” or an uncontrollable limit | Concrete promises that cannot be fulfilled are egregious; “Promising loans” and “no credit check” are named | 1 egregious violation = 1 strike |
| Misrepresentation — offers | Free-money or cash-giveaway framing | “Free or cash offers” and “Unreasonably cheap offers” are egregious | 1 egregious violation = 1 strike |
| Personalized-ad restriction (US/Canada) | Targeting by gender, age, parental status, marital status or ZIP code | Credit-related, banking and certain financial planning categories are restricted | Personalized delivery prohibited; no strike count stated |
| Sensitive financial information | Segments built on “bad credit” or “high debt” | Lower-credit-rating or higher-debt signals are sensitive audience data | Privacy prohibition; no strike count stated |
| Ad value and layout | Ad or AFS unit as focal point, or paid content exceeding publisher content | Paid content may not exceed publisher content; copied content needs added value; AFS must not be focal point | 5 normal = 1 strike; 1 egregious = 1 strike |
Promise defects carry a direct strike consequence. Personalization and sensitive-data defects concern delivery and audience data, so copy edits do not fix them. Layout defects are structural choices, not phrases.
Layout Problems Beyond Sentences: Duplicated Offers and Ad Share
A credit card roundup assembled from issuer pages can fail the ad-value rule even when every sentence is defensible. Google’s policy excludes pages built mainly on embedded or copied content without added commentary, organization or value. Show what the page adds: explanation of how listed terms differ, source labeling and comparison structure that does not imply the publisher verified outcomes.
The behavioral rules constrain balance. Ads and other paid promotional content must not occupy more page space than the publisher’s own content. For an offer table, reduce promotional units, move them out of the visual center, or add substantive content around it. AFS units may not use misleading prompts or become focal points. Sources must accurately describe the landing page, must not promise offers absent or hard to find there, and the page must look substantially the same as it does for organic visitors.
The AFS Layer: Related-Search Wording and Placement Limits
AFS adds constraints beyond content ads. Related-search terms sent to Google must match exactly the term the user clicked, and the click must resolve to a results page on the publisher’s own site with relevant results. “Search now for the best offer” is a poor fit: the retrieved policy lists it, with “click here,” as a normal-violation example and bars misleading prompts that push users into the product feature.
Placement limits are concrete: at most two search ad boxes per page, ads only on search results pages, one request per user action, one query per user request, and no incentives to view ads or run searches. Treat these as template constraints. The strike asymmetry also matters: five normal violations equal one strike; one egregious violation equals one strike.
Pre-Publish Checks and the Limits of This Evidence
Run three passes. Copy: locate guarantee language, “no credit check,” free-money framing and uncontrollable outcomes; remove the promise, keep the useful explanation. Structure: check copied or embedded material without added commentary, whether paid promotional content outweighs publisher content, and whether the AFS unit is the focal point. Delivery: confirm targeting and audience lists avoid restricted categories and sensitive financial-status signals, and that AFS terms, placement and incentives meet the limits above.
Then record the boundaries. Policy statements here come from retrieved Google publisher and AFS text; Google may revise it. This article verifies no card, issuer, APR, fee, limit or approval outcome. US consumer-credit disclosure law is outside this evidence; credit-offer pages need qualified legal or compliance review. The US/Canada restriction is category-level, so confirm coverage on the current policy page. Classification is Google’s determination. The strike ratio is quoted from the retrieved table; no claim is made about review duration or account outcomes.
研究の知恵