The topic is allowed; the targeting and claims are not
Google’s retrieved restricted-content list covers pornography, shocking content, explosives, firearms, other weapons, tobacco, recreational drugs, alcohol, online gambling, prescription drugs, unapproved drugs or supplements, and apps removed from Play. It has no credit or finance category. Credit cards appear instead as an example under personalized advertising: “credit-related products and services.” A credit-card explainer, comparison page, or offer roundup is therefore not banned by topic. The exposure lies in targeting, disclosure, and copy. A page can still fail because of a ZIP-code segment, an inferred debt problem, or a “no credit check” line. Review those layers separately rather than treating “credit card” as a restricted keyword.
Who may receive credit-related ads in the US and Canada
For personalized advertising in the US and Canada, Google’s publisher policy bars targeting credit-related products and services, banking products and services, and certain financial planning or management services by gender, age, parental status, marital status, or ZIP code. “Credit cards and loans” are the policy’s own examples. A finance audience built from “women aged 25–34 in one ZIP code” cannot be used for these ads, even if the page is a legitimate explainer. The rule concerns selection attributes, not the page subject. Audit audience names, source fields, and agency handoffs that recreate those segments; renaming alone does not cure a prohibited input. The retrieved limit covers the US and Canada only; do not assume other markets match. This is a policy boundary, not a legal review of consumer-credit rules.
Sensitive money signals and other blocked personalization inputs
Negative financial-status information is especially risky. Google’s policy treats a low credit rating or high debt burden as sensitive and bars their use to select or target personalized ads or to build or use audience cookie lists. An inference from browsing behavior still counts if it produces that financial-status picture. Other prohibited inputs include past or current activity on adult, gambling, or government sites, and activity involving users under 13 or sites aimed at children under 13. Ask whether an audience depends on a financial-difficulty signal; if yes, remove it. Contextual placement avoids that input, but labeling, disclosure, and claim rules still apply.
Disclosure duties on a credit-card page
Personalized or interest-based ads served through Google products require an in-ad disclosure that the ad is interest-based, such as the Ad Options icon; the retrieved policy assigns that notice to the advertiser and requires all parties to follow industry self-regulatory codes such as the Digital Advertising Alliance’s Self-Regulatory Principles for Online Behavioral Advertising or the IAB Europe EU framework. Publishers must also keep and follow a privacy policy disclosing data collection, sharing, and use arising from Google products and services, including cookies, web beacons, IP addresses, or other identifiers. Google offers a data-use page publishers may link from that policy. Check that the link resolves, covers identifiers your ad code can set, and matches the vendors actually present. Do not reuse a generic paragraph. This covers Google publisher policy, not US privacy or credit law.
Offer wording: egregious versus ordinary promises
The retrieved punishment guidance separates claim problems into two tiers with asymmetric strike weighting. Use the table as a wording audit, not a complete enforcement guide.
| Tier in retrieved guidance | Example wording | Violation class | Strike weighting |
|---|
| Vague or non-explicit promise; specific information promised but not delivered | “Graduate education should be affordable! Let’s go!”; “See a list of top doctors near you!” with no real list | Ordinary | 5 violations = 1 strike |
| Concrete, explicit, impossible-to-fulfill promise, including credit offers | “Promising loans”; “Open a PNC high-yield savings account with no credit check!” | Egregious | 1 violation = 1 strike |
A concrete promise that cannot be fulfilled—“promising loans” or an account offer “with no credit check”—is egregious: one violation equals one strike. Vague or non-explicit promises, and specific information promised but not delivered, are ordinary: five violations equal one strike. The bank named in the second row is illustrative wording, not an endorsement or product fact. Rewrite toward what the page can deliver. Replace approval or eligibility promises with a precise scope description, then supply that content. If the page promises a list of questions to ask before applying, the list must exist and be visible. Do not add a promise the advertiser did not make.
AFS units on credit-card search pages
AdSense for Search adds a separate layer. Place code only on search results pages; at most two AFS ad boxes per page; no framing; no deleting or modifying the Google logo; no integration into software such as toolbars or browser extensions. Queries must reflect genuine user intent: no pre-filled search boxes or publisher-created links with pre-filled terms, one search-ad request per user action, and the user’s words sent exactly. Ads must be clearly identified and separated from natural results, must not outnumber them, and may not be rewarded with incentives for viewing ads or searching. If paid or affiliate traffic lands on a related-search page, the traffic source must accurately describe it, promise no absent or hard-to-find offerings, and the landing page must be substantially the same as the organically reached version—no paid-versus-organic split.
Pre-publish checks and the limits of this guidance
Before publishing, run five checks: remove gender, age, parental status, marital status, and ZIP targeting from credit, banking, and financial-planning campaigns; delete audiences built on low credit rating, high debt, or other sensitive financial signals; confirm the privacy policy and in-ad interest-based disclosure; rewrite impossible-to-fulfill credit promises; and inspect AFS placement, query handling, labeling, and traffic-source fidelity. Confirm current wording on the live Google help-center pages, because policies change. This covers retrieved Google publisher and AFS policy only. It does not compare cards, supply rates or fees, address US consumer-credit statutes, predict enforcement outcomes, or offer legal or financial advice.
研究の知恵